Rapid categorization paradigms have a long history in experimental psychology: Characterized by short presentation times and speeded behavioral responses, these tasks highlight the efficiency with which our visual system processes natural object categories. Previous studies have shown that feed-forward hierarchical models of the visual cortex provide a good fit to human visual decisions. At the same time, recent work in computer vision has demonstrated significant gains in object recognition accuracy with increasingly deep hierarchical architectures. But it is unclear how well these models account for human visual decisions and what they may reveal about the underlying brain processes. We have conducted a large-scale psychophysics study to assess the correlation between computational models and human behavioral responses on a rapid animal vs. non-animal categorization task. We considered visual representations of varying complexity by analyzing the output of different stages of processing in three stateof-the-art deep networks. We found that recognition accuracy increases with higher stages of visual processing (higher level stages indeed outperforming human participants on the same task) but that human decisions agree best with predictions from intermediate stages. Overall, these results suggest that human participants may rely on visual features of intermediate complexity and that the complexity of visual representations afforded by modern deep network models may exceed the complexity of those used by human participants during rapid categorization.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Thus, there is a need for a reference point, on which each model canbetested andfrom where potential improvements canbe derived. In this study, we select publicly available state-of-the-art visual search models and datasets in natural scenes, and provide a common framework for their evaluation. To this end, we apply a unified format and criteria, bridging the gaps between them, and we estimate the models' efficiency and similarity with humans using a specific set of metrics.

Machine learning assisted state prediction of misspecified linear dynamical system via modal reduction Rohan Vittal Thorat a, Rajdip Nayek a a Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, 110016, IndiaAbstract Accurate prediction of structural dynamics is imperative for preserving digital twin fidelity throughout operational lifetimes. Parametric models with fixed nominal parameters often omit critical physical effects due to simplifications in geometry, material behavior, damping, or boundary conditions, resulting in model form errors (MFEs) that impair predictive accuracy. This work introduces a comprehensive framework for MFE estimation and correction in high-dimensional finite element (FE) based structural dynamical systems. The Gaussian Process Latent Force Model (GPLFM) represents discrepancies non-parametrically in the reduced modal domain, allowing a flexible data-driven characterization of unmodeled dynamics. A linear Bayesian filtering approach jointly estimates system states and discrepancies, incorporating epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties. To ensure computational tractability, the FE system is projected onto a reduced modal basis, and a mesh-invariant neural network maps modal states to discrepancy estimates, permitting model rectification across different FE dis-cretizations without retraining. Validation is undertaken across five MFE scenarios--including incorrect beam theory, damping misspecification, misspecified boundary condition, unmodeled material nonlinearity, and local damage --demonstrating the surrogate model's substantial reduction of displacement and rotation prediction errors under unseen excitations. The proposed methodology offers a potential means to uphold digital twin accuracy amid inherent modeling uncertainties. Keywords: Model bias, Gaussian Process, Latent Force Model, Bayesian filtering, Modal reduction, Digital twin 1. Introduction The reliable simulation of structural dynamical systems is central to engineering analysis, design, and decision-making. In practice, high-fidelity models are often impractical due to limited information, computational constraints, or simplifying assumptions in geometry, boundary conditions, damping mechanisms, and material constitutive laws. These idealizations lead to model form errors (MFEs)--systematic discrepancies between the predicted and actual system responses--which, if unaccounted for, can significantly degrade predictive accuracy. This challenge is especially critical in the context of digital twins, where model predictions directly inform monitoring and decision-making. Digital twins of structural systems integrate computational models with real-time or historical measurement data to enable continuous prediction, monitoring, and decision making [1, 2].